> my logic was the thickest one is safest but i am totally lost on brands. is an expensive case actually better than a cheap one? In my experience, thickness is only half the battle. I learned that the hard way when a thick generic case literally shattered on a rocky trail because the plastic was too brittle. You want energy absorption, not just bulk. If you're hitting the trails tomorrow, I'd go with the iPhone+16+Pro+Max+with+MagSafe&linkCode=osi&------123456890?5422-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">OtterBox Defender Series XT Case for iPhone 16 Pro Max with MagSafe. It uses a multi-layer system that actually disperses impact away from the glass. I have dropped my gear onto jagged granite with this thing and it barely left a scuff. Another solid choice is the iPhone+16+Pro+Max+with+Kickstand&linkCode=osi&------123456890?5422-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Spigen Tough Armor MagFit for iPhone 16 Pro Max with Kickstand. It's got this XRD foam inside that specifically absorbs shock. Honestly, for hiking, pay the premium for a brand name because the cheap generic ones usually skip the internal dampening tech... gotta protect that investment.

> my logic was the thickest one is safest Unfortunately, I found out the hard way that thickness doesnt always mean better protection. Massive cases often have issues with being too slippery, which actually caused me more drops. Not as good as expected... Now I stick with iPhone+16+Pro+Max&linkCode=osi&------123456890?5422-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">UAG Monarch Pro Carbon Fiber iPhone 16 Pro Max. It is incredibly rugged for hiking. The iPhone+16+Pro+Max&linkCode=osi&------123456890?5422-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Mous Limitless 5.0 Aramid Fibre iPhone 16 Pro Max is another reliable choice that wont fail you.

This thread is gold. Bookmarking for future reference 🔖

TIL! Thanks for sharing